Quality Control

Cross-cutting

Quality Control validates work at every major handoff in the pipeline. It checks accessibility, brand compliance, code quality, voice consistency, and cross-skill coherence against the Deevoted quality bar. When issues are found, it flags them with severity levels and sends fixable issues back for resolution.

← Receives from: Any skill at handoff moments Hands off to: The originating skill (for fixes) or advances the pipeline →
What It Produces

Deliverables

Quality Report
Detailed validation results organized by category, with severity-ranked issues.
QC History
Running log of all quality checks across the project.
Brand Compliance Record
Verification that all deliverables meet the established brand standards.
Project QC Record
Comprehensive quality documentation for the entire project.
4
key deliverables
How It Works

Operating Pattern

Receives

Receives deliverables from any skill at handoff moments.

Processes

Runs validation against 13 categories. Issues ranked by severity: critical, significant, and minor. Fixable issues sent back automatically.

Hands Off

Approved deliverables advance the pipeline. Flagged issues route to the originating skill or to human review.

Integrates with BrowserStack for cross-browser testing and Email on Acid for email verification.
Deliverable Examples

Example Output

Acme Rebrand acme-rebrand-quality-report.md

Quality Report — Contrast Audit

Eyebrow text

Clay on Bone — 3.72:1 ❌ Pine on Bone — 11.1:1 ✅

Clay #C0633C on Bone #F7F3EA measured 3.72:1 at 12px — below the WCAG 2.1 AA threshold of 4.5:1 for normal text. Replaced with Pine #1E3A33, which measures 11.1:1.

Footer muted text

Stone on Bone — 3.30:1 ❌ Ink on Bone — 14.79:1 ✅

Stone #8C857A on Bone #F7F3EA measured 3.30:1 at 13px. Replaced with Ink #221F1D (14.79:1). Both findings resolved via fix-and-resubmit — the build now conforms to the brief’s stated color rules.

Pipeline Context
Analytics Quality Control Social Media Cross-cutting …